27 November 2006
Yes, it’s time for the almost-monthly post about browser width!
I know, I know – you’re all thrilled.
Over on 456 Berea St, Roger Johansson has posted an interesting roundup of the current thinking on fluid vs fixed width sites. His conclusion is the same as mine – namely that fluid width sites are the way to go, but optimising them for a specific size makes a lot of sense.
What really gets me is that we’re still having this debate.
There are very few legitimate reasons for using a fixed width site, the main one being concerns over the line length on a fluid width site; obviously as the site gets wider, the line length gets longer which is bad for readability. This is can easily be countered by using max-width, larger font sizes and so on but is really quite faulty thinking – if the solution is a fixed width site that’s sized for 1024×768 then if you’re window is any smaller then that then the line isn’t readable at all, which is obviously much worse.
The reason for the debate then?
Plain and simple. I’m guilty of it (you can find a fair few fixed width sites in my portfolio), make no mistake. It’s that simple – if making a fluid width site was as easy as making a fixed width site, I’m sure 99% would be fluid width.
Positioning using percentage measurements, mixing fluid elements with static elements and making it all work across browser is not an easy job (especially with IE’s broken CSS rendering). The other problem is the bigger one, however – it simply takes more skill to visualise a fluid width at the design stage. When you make a web site design (probably in something like Photoshop) it obviously starts off as static – you have no way of testing how it’ll stretch in a browser. You’ve got to picture how that’s going to work, and design accordingly.
That’s not easy, folks.
What’s sad is that many web developers seem to be lying to themselves over the reasons why – their aren’t any good ones for not going fluid, it’s all simply a matter of effort.
Last week a new band came in to play us their freshly delivered debut album. There is protocol in these situations. Everyone must sit in rapturous contemplation and laser focused attention. Heads must bob. Feet must tap. After every track you must make some gesture that indicates that, yes, that...
Let’s take stock, shall we? By all accounts, the world has gone crazy. Not as bad as when it’s been really bad, but, you know, bad. Facts are dead. It is entirely possible that some people genuinely think up is actually down, and to say anything different is unpatriotic. In...
I was talking recently with someone I know who works at a music media company. I say “media company” both to be purposefully vague but also because I struggle to think of a better term that encompasses the merging worlds of distribution, retail and promotion.
Day in, day out, they get...
Releasing music is getting complicated, isn’t it? Once, you’d simply use huge factories dotted around the world to etch your record onto a small plastic disc, then use fleets of planes, trains and automobiles to get them into thousands of stores dotted around high streets hither and thither.
Now you just...
I have two main ways of getting to work. One way – my normal way – involves a slightly soulless walk, slightly mediocre coffee, and a slightly less crowded tube train at the end of it. The other way features rammed carriages but significantly better flat whites.
I was in the...