David Emery Online

Hi there, I’m David. This is my website. I work in music for Apple. You can find out a bit more about me here. On occasion I’ve been known to write a thing or two. Please drop me a line and say hello. Views mine not my employers.

Signup to receive the latest articles from de-online in your inbox:

wahwah.fm

Other wahwah.fm users can tune into your broadcast and hear the exact same music you are listening to. It's like running your own mobile radio station. Anywhere you are. Anytime you like.

Looks quite interesting – reminds me a little of the Gil Scott-Heron and Jamie xx Album Transmitter we did a couple of months ago.

Visit ➔

Google And Amazon May Have Just Handed Apple The Keys To The Cloud Music Kingdom

So the labels, which for the better part of a decade now have been looking for someone, anyone to help counter Apple’s power in their business, is turning right back to Apple when they need help. And Apple will obviously gladly welcome them with open arms. After all, with these licenses, Apple will have secured the cloud music high ground despite being the last to launch.

My prediction (based on no insider knowledge): Apple will launch their cloud service in September which quickly becomes the market leader – due to the fact you won’t have to spend 3 days over ADSL uploading your music library to it – even though it’s more expensive then Amazon and Google. Amazon and Google will then scrabble around and get licenses from the labels but by that point Apple’s service will be entrenched, in much the same way the iTunes Store is.

Apple wins again, and the labels still don’t have a decent digital competitor for iTunes.

I love the fact that for years I’ve been hearing things like “we shouldn’t have let Apple come in and take over digital music retailing, we should have built our own store first” yet the exact same mistakes are being made again with cloud music. And it’s not as though this kind of venture is beyond the major labels – look at Vevo, which is a pretty good stab at this kind of thing but for music videos.

Visit ➔

Check Out Danger Mouse's Interactive 3D Video

Rome, the new album from Danger Mouse and Italian composer Daniele Luppi, is inspired by spaghetti westerns, so it makes sense that a video from the album would be a filmic experience unto itself. Danger Mouse has teamed up with Google and director Chris Milk, the man behind Arcade Fire's amazing interactive "The Wilderness Downtown" video, to make "3 Dreams of Black", an interactive 3D complement to the Rome track "Black", which features Norah Jones on vocals.

Looks beautiful, and an amazing demonstration of what you can do with the right browser without Flash these days, but the interactivity seems like an afterthought.

Visit ➔

"Location, location, location": Radio 1 Big Weekend Check-In Experiment

The Radio 1 Big Weekend offered the perfect opportunity to try this. We know the line-up in detail, and where each stage is located, and we know the audience has an appetite for 'sharing their pride' via social networks. Some research was conducted to see which platform would reach the most users, and somewhat unsurprisingly Facebook was in the top slot.

Nice HTML5-based location check-in work by the BBC.

Visit ➔

Top Ten Most Powerful

Spotify: It’s been too long and the message has been muddled.  Now there are listening limits and purchase options and…didn’t Apple succeed by keeping it simple?  Spotify is playing to the labels as opposed to the audience and it’s hurting them, like everyone else who’s tried to play by rights holder rules in the past.  You can only win by being a renegade.  Right now, Grooveshark looks more like the future than Spotify.

Completely agree with this – it feels like a death by a thousand (music industry) cuts with Spotify at the moment. They’re a lot less interesting then they used to be, and I don’t think a subscription product without a decent free ad-supported version is a mainstream product.

I think TopSpin’s importance is being overstated here though – haven’t we all realised that direct-to-fan retailing can work for some artists but is by no means going to be a massive part of the industry? It’s a niche market, but a potentially lucrative one.

Visit ➔

Without The Labels, Google’s Music Locker Service Will Look Like Apple’s Ugly Sibling. Again.

This evening the WSJ reported that after a year of (failed) discussions with the labels Google will finally be launching a music service tomorrow at Google I/O — and it’s very similar to Amazon’s, which also doesn’t have approval from the labels. I spoke with Google’s Jamie Rosenberg, head of digital content and strategy for Android, who confirmed the news. And while he says that Google will improve on Amazon’s offering in many ways, one month from now I’m guessing it will look significantly less impressive.

A Flash-based music locker without label involvement (meaning you have to upload all your MP3s yourself, which will take ages) is hardly very exciting or innovative, is it?

The one interesting thing about this is that this beta version is going to be free, and I can see it staying that way (with ads, of course, but also just to fortify the Android platform). That’s going to make Amazon’s life in this market pretty difficult…

Visit ➔

Spotify says hello to the iPod

You’ve been telling us how much you love discovering, sharing and talking about music in Spotify - and you’ve created well over 200 million playlists to prove it. But you’ve also said you’re listening to a huge amount of music on your iPods, and that getting your Spotify playlists onto them as MP3s has been a serious hassle, forcing you to juggle multiple music players. That’s until now…

Spotify are pretty clearly trying to supplant iTunes as peoples music player of choice which is no bad thing – Apple could really do with some decent competition in this regard, as iTunes has turned into a bloated mess over the years.

I’m intrigued by their download store offering as well, which obviously pares nicely with their new limits on how many times you can listen to tracks if you’re not a premium offering. The focus on bundles of tracks – ostensibly to allow purchasing of playlists – doesn’t seem like a feature that the majority are going to be interested in, however; sounds cool in theory – “people can share playlists and buy them” – but iTunes has had that feature (albeit without the pricing incentives) for years without much success.

It does also strike me that this is a slightly backwards move for Spotify, all in all – dealing with actual files and having your own library was what they originally rebelled against; I guess this is just a reaction to the constraints they’re in, but it certainly dilutes the brand a fair bit.

Visit ➔

The “book” is dead

But more to the point, it would be full of piracy-related terms because that’s what people search for. Google’s suggestions come from actual searches. It’s a mirror onto the world, descriptive not prescriptive. If you don’t like how the world looks in the mirror, don’t blame the mirror.

Interesting post on how the book industry is now facing up to digital piracy, much in the same way the music industry has (or hasn’t, depending on your point of view). It also shows how much work Google needs to do with its search results – not to eliminate copyright infringing results, as that’s practically impossible, but to eliminate the huge amount of fake sites that clog up most results pages.

Visit ➔

later.fm

With later.fm you can bookmark music while you browse and listen to it later.

I love the Internet – I’ve been thinking about this very idea for a few weeks now, to the point where I was seriously considering trying to make it myself (which would have never worked) and lo and behold someone’s already made it.

Visit ➔